A sullen resentment weighs down the American Psyche. The USA has been going downhill for so long, that people don’t know who to lash out at. So often the gnashing of teeth and growls of resentment will feature the striking out at the wrong target.

Such is the case in Wisconsin. Erstwhile right-wingers & Tea Baggers are lining up behind Governor Scott Walker and his union-busting campaign, part of his campaign to turn Wisconsin into a plantation. Otherwise sensible folks are lining up in this game of zapping labor, lining up with the dregs of the reactionary Right.

Teachers are not the enemy. If their unions have afforded them at least temporary protection against the ravages of the New World Order, one should emulate them rather than cast stones.

But increasing numbers are resentful of the teachers. But teachers and the Unions are not the cause of the steady decline in US living standards since 1972. It’s the Free Trade Regime which kicked in under Nixon in 1973. A slippery slope ever since.

It wasn’t feminist ideology that caused the massive entry of women into the workforce; it was sheer economic necessity.

It wasn’t the Unions who caused the dismantling of America’s manufacturing base, it was Ronald Reagan.

Illegal immigration has gone a long way into lowering the wage level. Most illegal immigration over the past 40 years has occurred under Republican auspices.

Democrats were no help on trade or immigration. Liberal champion Ted Kennedy was one of the biggest free traders of all. And he grooved on busing for forced integration as long as his his kids weren’t involved. And need I mention that old Plutocratic Whore Bill Clinton?

In fact, it was the Labor movement which put up a fight. But it was feeble and muscled aside by the ‘Washington consensus.’

So those following the lead of Zombie Right in the Wisconsin crisis are picking on the wrong enemy.

But something more is at play here. Among American ‘conservatives’ there is a certain ritual of Primitive Magic. They think by lining up on the side of the Plutocracy and Finance-Capital that maybe some of that wealth will rub off on them.

Still, there’s even something more at play here. Why do ‘conservatives’ crave authoritarian leadership? Why their affinity for thugs like Wisconsin Governor Walker? Why this taking the side of the rich & powerful. Indeed, why do ‘conservatives’ seem to get sexually aroused by all this? Why do so many old Republicans turn gay?

I would urge ‘conservatives’ and Tea Baggers to stay out of my home state of Wisconsin. Hire a woman to beat you up instead. You’ll still get off in the same way!

In 1960, the USA was 90% white, only 5% of the population was foreign-born, the South and adjacent border states were racially segregated, and 29 states prohibited inter-racial marriage. The country was still enjoying the fruits of the postwar boom which had created the first mass prosperity the world had ever seen. A stalemate with the Soviet Union in the Cold War kept the peace. Within a decade, that world was turned upside down.

Change was already in the air in 1960. Previously in 1958, five men associated with the National States Rights Party were indicted for blowing up a Jewish synagogue in Atlanta. There were no injuries. But the bombing convinced the white business community in Atlanta that the integration of the downtown business district would be peaceful. Gradualism seemed to be in the offing.

But the pace was evidently going to be too slow for many, so black college students started staging sit-ins at segregated lunch counters.
At the same time, a white Southern fightback was under way. The main political vehicle was supposed to be the National States Rights Party.

The NSRP, which had been founded in 1958, was not just staunchly segregationist but openly White Supremacist and anti-Jewish as well. Its leaders were Party Chairman J.B. Stoner and Ed Fields, Editor of the NSRP’s newspaper THE THUNDERBOLT. The Party was denounced as neo-Nazi but conservative-populist would be a more accurate label. With the USA being overwhelmingly white and pro-segregation still the majority sentiment in the South, the National States Rights Party proposed nothing more extraordinary than contesting elections. The one-party Democratic South seemed ripe for the pickings. Southern Democrats were being tarred with the brush of the liberal Kennedy Administration. Republicans were still largely a paper organization, still tarred with the brush of the First Reconstruction.

The NSRP was poised to intervene in a major way. Moreover, in 1962 they were heartened by the Canadian elections where the conservative-populist Social Credit Party gained 30 seats and established itself as Canada’s Third Party. The NSRP hoped to emulate that success.

John Kasper was to be the Party’s candidate for President in 1964. His journey began in 1950 when as a 20 year old student at Columbia University he wrote a term paper comparing poet Ezra Pound to Friedrich Nietzsche. He sent a copy to Pound and they began corresponding.

Who was Ezra Pound? Ezra Pound was quite simply America’s greatest living poet. He had been a mentor to others including Robert Frost. He got T.S. Eliot’s breakthrough poem “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” to be be published as well as ULYSSES, the experimental novel by James Joyce. He took the young Ernest Hemingway under his wing.

In 1925, the same year THE SUN ALSO RISES was published, Hemingway wrote this of Ezra Pound:

He defends his friends when they are attacked, he gets them into magazines and out of jail. He loans them money. He writes articles about them. He introduces them to wealthy women. He gets publishers to take their books. He sits up all night with them when they claim to be dying. He advances them hospital expenses and dissuade them from suicide.”

But did I mention that when John Kasper met Pound, the world famous poet was incarcerated in an American mental hospital which he called the ‘the booby hatch.’

Ezra Pound, an expatriate in Europe most of his life, was profoundly shaken by the carnage of the First World War. He blamed the war on international capitalism. But like T.S. Eliot, D.H. Lawrence and Louis-Ferdinand Celine, Ezra Pound was on the political Right, not the Left. He located the evil in finance-capitalism which he termed usury. He saw the solution in the Social Credit theories of C.H. Douglas. And he saw fascism as the means for putting Social Credit into practice. His writings on this are codified in his book, JEFFERSON AND/OR MUSSOLINI. A leading critic of Franklin Roosevelt, he termed the New Deal to be the Nude Eel.

During World War II, Pound broadcast on Rome Radio for Fascist Italy. Near the end of the war he was captured by American troops. He was to be transported beck to the States to be tried for treason.

But was he guilty? In his broadcasts, he did attack Roosevelt’s family and blamed the Jews for the war. But in his radio talks, the brilliant but eccentric Pound was just as likely to talk about poetry and Chinese philosophy.

There was a real question of his ultimate sanity. So the government took the easy way out and place him at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in DC, a mental institution. It was there that John Kasper met him.

John Kasper was to be converted to the political, economic and social views of Ezra Pound. This made Kasper, like Pound, a white racial advocate which included antagonism toward Jews.

John Kasper would move South in the 1950s to become an activist against the court-ordered integration of the public schools.

We pick up the story in our next Blog.

Like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter is an expert entertainer. And like Limbaugh, she infinitely brighter than befuddled pinhead Glenn Beck.

Coulter has targeted her audience and shakes the rattle in front of them. They are the Movement Conservatives who need constant reassurance because their core doctrine is incoherent. This is the fusion conservatism invented by turncoat Red Frank Meyer and publicized in Wm F Buckley’s NATIONAL REVIEW. The ‘fusion’ name comes up welding together the limited government of Robert Taft with the unlimited National Security State.

Buckley acknowledged that the contradiction. He said the explosion in the growth of Big Government, caused by the National Security State, would be a ‘temporary’ evil until the Cold War was won.

If that sounds like Marx’s promise of ‘the withering away of the state,’ it has the same effect. Nothing withers away on its own.

If Rush Limbaugh’s schtick is rabble rouser radio, Coulter’s is books.  Her books lack real intellectual depth and are really designed to let her audience of middle-aged conservatives let off steam. Her arguments are meant to be provocative. They’re not designed for intellectual discourse but bar room arguments. There, shouting matches and brawls usually ensue. If, by rare chance, her lines do win somebody over, all you’ve won is a drunk. Whoopee! That’ll really change the world!

But, again, like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter has a more insidious purpose. To wit: Deflect any serious criticism of the System which is essentially a Dictatorship of the Global Financial Elite. For proof, just ask anyone who tried to call into Limbaugh with a criticism of the Federal Reserve. For her part, Coulter skillfully directs anger at generally impotent liberal targets. It’s fun to vent on the likes of Rosie O’Donnell, who generally has it coming. But Rosie has no power so the vented anger is wasted.

And like Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter is absolutely venomous towards widows and families of those who perished on 9/11 and want real answers. There, like Beck, she shows her true colors. Even Rosie has a better position than her.

Ann Coulter wrote book called TREASON which generally indicts liberal Democrats. Trouble is, some of the biggest acts of outright treason have Republican fingerprints all over them.

According to the Israelis, it was Republican Allen Dulles who tipped off the Nazis that the British had broken their code. That’s why the Wehrmacht maintained complete radio silence leading to the Battle of the Budge which nearly defeated the Allies on the Western Front.

And what about the 1980 Reagan-Bush Campaign making a deal with Iran not to release the hostages until Carter was defeated? That was the real beginning of Iran-Contra of which Coulter is silent about.

In between, there was the Nixon Regime getting the CIA involved big time in the global drug trade.

Coulter is silent on this as well. It’s more fun to attack a Hollywood airhead like Jane Fonda. Fonda’s antics might have been obnoxious but she didn’t have any power to do damage which amounts to anything.

Ann Coulter leads would-be patriots in the wrong direction.

If our goal is to rebuild FROM SCRATCH a militant & effective American Right, then we consistently point to Francis Parker Yockey, Lawrence Dennis and Jean Thiriart. Yockey was an expatriate and Thiriart was Belgian. Dennis had to hide the fact that his mother was what used to be called a mulatto; I don’t know the politically correct term today. Anyway, all three are largely unknown in the USA today.

Lawrence Dennis, who had worked at a major investment banking house, saw the investment bankers and their stranglehold over the economy as the real villains of the Great Depression. He felt it would take a revolution to dislodge them. He preferred a fascist or nationalist revolution based on the middle classes to the classic proletarian revolution of the communists. It would be less bloodthirsty and less destructive. Such a revolution would also be more in line with American traditions.

Francis Parker Yockey initially agreed in principle with the approach of Dennis. He too saw ‘democracy’ just as a front for the very real Dictatorship of Finance-Capital. Yockey would also see present day libertarianism as just an ideological cover for indiscriminate looting by the financier.

But Yockey took a cold sober look at the capacity of the average American and the disintegration of the national character caused by the Culture Distorters. He had no doubt that some kind of base could be built among that minority of Americans who managed to stay aloof from the crowd, indeed, mob. But he felt that America, being burdened by the stupidest political Right in the world, was almost a hopeless case. Therefore, Yockey believed that the Liberation of Europe would have to precede the Liberation of America. Thus he founded the European Liberation Front, the first political organization in the world to have word liberation in its name.

Jean Thiriart’s contribution was to be the great theorist of the European Revolution. He did this by insisting that the Soviet Union be part of any united European Imperium. Thiriart also with Jeune Europe actually began training a guerrilla army to oust the Yankee occupiers. He halted this effort when his friend & mentor, the great German commando Otto Skorzeny, said the effort was premature. The political preparation continues.

In America, at this time, our task is to destroy the Neocons. That is our job at this late hour. Since the Neocon capture of the Tea Party, we have to expose the Tea Partiers as stooges of the Banksters and no real alternative to the Obama Regime. Our model must be based on the The Minutemen and Patriotic Party of the late Robert B. DePugh. In a word, an American Cagoule.

The most effective slogans against the never ending wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have linked National Security with America First. Things like “Bring the Troops Home Now and Send Them to the Mexican Border.”

Obviously, those two hot wars overseas have nothing to do with our real security. Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11. Al Qaeda planning in Afghanistan was limited and, in any case, is all but extinct there.

In the meantime, our biggest National Security threat is on our own border. Vietnam veteran Gordon Duff, writing in VETERANS TODAY, has said one Army division could completely seal the border, period.

Also, in a practical sense, this line of argument gibes with what George Wallace said about the Vietnam War back in 1968: “Get in and win or get the hell out!” This would have resonated with the American public more than all of the hot air emanating out of the anti-war movement of the time. But, naturally, the brain dead American Right at the time never picked up on it. Instead, they were happy to take over prosecution of the faltering war from the liberals who started it. The Republicans didn’t do any better, just doubling the number of names which would appear on the future Vietnam Veterans Wall.

And fighting against the Iraq and Af-Pak Wars (and any future war with Iran) serves as a useful means of fighting the Neocons in the Tea Party movement.

Fighting against war from the Right has an honorable history in our country. Here we’re talking about the fight of the America First Committee for the USA to stay out of World War II. It had the support of half of the American populace. While it had its liberal supporters including the LaFollette family and the Wisconsin Progressives, Farmer Labor Senator Ernest Lundeen of Minnesota and Socialist Party leader Norman Thomas, mostly it was a conservative affair outside of the South.

The leadership like Charles Lindbergh were not pacifists. Rather, they concentrated on supporting measures to shoring up our defenses here at home. And it was effective. Only the Pearl Harbor attack defeated it.

Any effective movement has to come from the Right since the Left has totally crapped out. They haven’t recovered yet from their Obama swoon. (Obama is only a ‘Leftist’ in the rotted out brains of Zombie Republicans.)

Historically, the USA has the most stupid political Right in the world. Leading the fight against what has become Obama’s Wars is a key way of actually doing something for the country instead of just talking about it.

In the meantime, shards of the splintered Robotic Left want their protests to link opposition to war abroad to defense of illegals at home. Don’t let THEM be the voice of opposition!

The late Dr. Samuel Francis was one of the first to call himself a Paleoconservative. Since he hated the status quo, he emphasized ‘paleo’ over ‘conservative,’ writing:

“What paleoconservatism tries to tell Americans is that the dominant forces in their society are no longer committed to conserving the traditions, institutions, and values that created and formed it, and, therefore, that those who are really conservative in any serious sense and wish to live under those traditions, institutions, and values need to oppose the dominant forces and form new ones.”

He was THE enemy of the Neo-Cons, describing them as ‘crypto-Trotskyites.’ Francis was very disdainful of the ‘movement conservatives’ who allowed the Neo-Cons to take over their movement and the Republican Party without a fight, let alone a shot being fired. Though too much a Southern gentleman to use the apt term ‘pussy’ in public, that’s no doubt how he felt.

Along with his good friend Pat Buchanan and the late Robert Novak, Sam Francis was one of the few conservative voices to oppose the War Against Iraq. He termed the war illegitimate.

The Web site of Sam Francis proclaimed that he wrote about terrorism, race, immigration, education and other issues that “no other nationally syndicated columnist, left or right, would touch.” Without apology, he opposed immigration, multiculturalism, miscegnation, et al. His column on the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision mandating integration termed the ruling as “the most dangerous and destructive Supreme Court decision in American history.”

A 1994 speech before the American Renaissance Conference caused him to be fired by the “Washington Times” newspaper. But he said what he believed. He linked American success with European demographics; he called for Eurocentrism.

In practical terms, he called for:

1) a long-term moratorium on all immigration,
2) the withdrawal of the federal government from involvement in all racial issues, and
3) the repeal of all federal laws and court decisions (including the civil-rights laws of the 1960s and the rulings of the Warren Court) that authorize such involvement.

Sam Francis opposed the New World Order and advocated AMERICA FIRST! bumper stickers be plastered all over hell. And, sorry libertarians, Dr. Francis argued that defense of capitalism was NOT a conservative issue.

The last column of Sam Francis, published January 27, 2005, lambasted Dubya’s Second Inaugural Address, accusing Bush of “pop idealism.” He attacked Bush for being identical with liberalism and allowing Neo-Cons to swallow up his administration. (I equated it with the monster from the movie “Alien.”)

Dr Samuel T Francis passed February 15, 2005 after unsuccessful surgery to repair an aneurysm on his aorta. He was only 57.

The man had balls.

(Reprinted from American New Right, 6/19/09)

by Ian Huyett

I’m tired of hearing about how we have a ‘moral obligation’ to help Africa.

Next time you find a fat leech draining your blood, don’t pull it off. After all, the leech is less fortunate than you. You have a moral obligation to let it suck you dry.

Many liberals suffer from the misconception that Africans live in poverty because Africa itself is poor. The truth is that Africa is one of the most resource-rich places on Earth; Africans just don’t care. They aren’t interested in building better schools, hospitals, or governments. They’re only interested in butchering each other, and they’ve done a pretty damn good job of it since the beginning of recorded history.

In every new movie about Africa, we hear the cliche’ platitude “Nobody cares about Africa”. The truth is that everyone cares about Africa (obsessively, I might add) except the Africans themselves. If they’re not going to take care of themselves, neither should we.

Ever notice how American aid workers who dedicate their lives to helping Africans are always getting abducted, raped, and killed? Have you ever thought they may not want our help?

(American New Right is the name of a new blog. We urge you to check it out. We reprint from American New Right, 6/24/09)

The Coming Nationalist Schism

by Ian Huyett

In their quest for cheap labor, Europe’s globalists have opened the floodgates of our mother continent. As the tides of immigration wear down Europe’s infrastructure and erode its culture, the people of Europe are in an uproar. European nationalism has been given its greatest political opportunity of the decade.

It’s an opportunity that’s been missed.

Rather than unite against the people directly responsible for turning the valve, Europeans have allowed pseudo-nationalists like Geert Wilders to ride to power on a misguided, Neocon-esque wave of anti-Islamic hysteria. Confusing the charred corpses of Gazan children they’ve seen on the internet with the parasitic criminals that plague their neighborhoods, “nationalists” in Europe are becoming even more rabid supporters of Israel than America’s foreign lobbyist masters.

This unfortunate shift, accompanied by calls for European police states and opposition to free speech, has advanced the transformation of European Nationalism into American Neoconservatism. Groups once rooted in tradition and inspired by the likes of Julius Evola have begun to turn to the brainless ideology espoused by Leo Strauss and Dick Cheney (who, on an unrelated note, is currently serving his third term as President).

We American nationalists have had to deal with immigration of a different variety. When we  encounter Muslims (a tiny minority), we tend to look at them objectively, and in the end see them as fellow travelers in our struggle against a murderous common enemy. Eventually our Paleoconservatism and alliance with moderate Islam will put us at odds with Europe’s “nationalism”, its Neoconservatism, and its new romance with supremacist Judaism.

For now, the nationalist parties of Europe remain buddy-buddy with those of America and Canada. Nationalists like David Duke, who maintain strong ties to Islam, have yet to criticize the emerging anti-Islamic trends in groups such as the BNP. In time, nationalists on both sides of the puddle will be unable to ignore this fundamental difference. Unless we look this issue in the eye and address it now, it will spiral out of control and spark a conflict that will do irreversible damage, not only to our movement, but to our people.

(When the likes of David Horowitz brag up Geert Wilders & sponsor him, you know something’s amiss).